Video

How to Use ChatGPT to Ruin Your Legal Career

Lawyers

Contact Us


See also  (2020) Marketing for Criminal Defense Lawyers: Use This Idea to Get Clients Right Away
Contact Us

Tags

, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

31 thoughts on “How to Use ChatGPT to Ruin Your Legal Career”

  4. Chatgpt could not have made that up due to its programming, what most likely happened is that there was a mentioning in those cases of bankruptcy or some similar matter on the internet and because of that chat picked up on that and put into the case even though those mentioned cases had nothing to do with the case in which the information was sought. If people make up a case and put it into the internet chat will pick up on that as being an existing case not that it makes it up out of whole cloth. Chatgpt is out standing but you have to know how it works and what its limitations are and it works out just fine. Oh and it will soon replace 90% of the work load of lawyers and maybe even the whole of a lawyer's work and hopefully even judges, and prosecutors work it doesn't have a political opinion and does not worry about getting paid or who is elected. It has no feelings.

    Reply

  5. Hold on to your pants Mr. Lawyer. The US Supreme Court has once stated that Bankruptcy 11 USC is only as effective as the contractual parties agree, as the US Constitution provides that government can not abridge a contract absent fraud mistake or error. This means the stay imposed by a court can be objected to citing the provisions of the contract giving rights to a lender to accelerate on the note under certain conditions, such as foreclosure to satisfy the note. Another words if it is in the mortgage contract that a lender require full payment of the balance if a payment is missed and no payment is made the note holder can foreclose and no court can stay that action. There can be no such situation whereas a bankruptcy tolls any action as bankruptcy courts are unconstitutional on their face anyways.

    Reply

  7. I went to Lewis & Clark and while I wasn't studying law, the law library at that campus is one of the most stunning places to study I've ever been to. The setting and architecture are beautiful, the inside is cozy and the library itself is extensive, especially supplemented by the Watzek library across the street.

    Reply

  8. Clearly what’s happened is that they had a case they knew had no hope of winning, turned to chat gpt, possibly exhausted from looking for anything to shut this stupid client up, and got even the mildest hint that there was a reputable source of cases, saw it as an instant gotcha, and were so excited, possibly exhausted, and also very stupid, that they just shot that over to the airline. When they received a response from these foreign lawyers (perhaps feeling a bit superior to them?) They probably chalked it up to them being foreign and ignorant of federal cases, so sent an affidavit to the court anyway. Now being told by the court that the foreign lawyers were right, they doubled down out of an immense amount of stupidity, and submitted half-baked “bogus” cases hoping it would at least look like they did some research and weren’t absolute *BONEHEADS*.

    Reply

  11. It has been proven that LLMs are not and will not be able to not hallucinate. Therefore I don't use them, either my Texts ar so short that I'm faster writing them than I would be asking ChatGPT or they are long and need to be correct which would require more specific knowledge than ChatGPT could have and even then it still fails.

    Reply

  12. You would think that someone who has memorized an entirely separate dictionary to be able to communicate within their field would be smarter.
    The most intelligent idiots in the world.

    Reply

  18. So the Zicherman case is real, however, the real case pertains to a flight back in 1983, not a recent case like ChatGPT claims. It also applies to a completely different convention, the Warsaw convention.

    Reply

  23. I had assumed devin wasn't in front of a green screen but it was still visceral the way he pulled an actual case reporter from his shelves

    Reply

  24. LegalEagle..you deliver the content on your videos so well. How many times do you have to record to come off so smoothly?

    Reply

  25. Standing in the bathroom, plucking nose hairs while listening to THE legal Eagle tell me that I am actually smarter than those two lawyers really made my day. Go me! Thanks, Devin!!!

    Reply

  26. ChatGPT has a severe case of Dunning-Kruger. It's insanely confident about what it tells you and it actually knows very little. At best, it's summarizing the top 10 Google searches on the same topic. You'd get better references straight off of Wikipedia.

    Reply

  28. Genshin doesn’t have PvP though. Big spenders just have an easier time playing the game by one shotting everything. Then they get bored and take a break.

    Reply

  30. As a lawyer, i am sweating bullets thinking of the horror of realizing such a collosal fk-up

    Reply

Leave a Comment